Of all the sub-categories of trail running shoes, the most versatile option for most runners is road to trail. While many of us wish we could run on nothing but soft woodland trails or mountain rocks, chances are you're gonna hit some road on your way to the good stuff.
The best road to trail running shoes require a range of features; you’ll need cushioning for the road, but you’ll also need high-traction grip, rock protection, and a lot of durability.
A true road shoe might be able to take on easy trails at the height of summer, but come autumn, you'll need a pair that offers some extra security in slippery conditions.
In addition to good grip, you'll also want a degree of stability to support you on uneven ground. This will likely come in the form of a plastic insert in the midsole, or even a carbon fibre plate, which we'll get into in the advice section at the end of this round-up.
What are the best road to trail running shoes for 2025?
Let's address the elephant in the room – this list contains quite a few Hoka shoes. This isn't for any sponsor-y or shady reason, Hoka are just really good at producing soft, high-cushioning, high-traction running shoes.
Still, we've also included plenty of top performers from other trail brands like Asics and Adidas, and we even tested an offering from Lululemon! We're thrilled to report that it puts in a solid performance, so anyone looking to transition from road to trail running without straying too far, there's your pick.
Best road to trail running shoes at a glance
How we test road to trail running shoes

To find the best road to trail running shoes, we tested each model across the full range of terrain they’re designed to handle – from tarmac and gravel paths to dry woodland, rocky byways and (where possible) a bit of mud.
We looked for grip, durability, and how confidently each shoe transitions between surfaces. That means testing traction, ground feel, and underfoot protection, while also considering road-friendly ride quality and responsiveness.
Of course, since hard (and evil) roads are involved, cushioning is key, so that's what we looked for before anything else. But we also paid close attention to weight, stability, fit and drop. A versatile road to trail running shoe should feel smooth on pavement without becoming sloppy on more uneven terrain.
For more, here's a full breakdown of how we test gear at LFTO.
Best road to trail running shoes reviewed:
Though they may look more on the maximalist side, the Hoka Speedgoat 6 are a stunningly popular pair of trail running shoes. That's all down to their versatility and agility on the trail. After our first run in the Speedgoat, we were instantly impressed by their responsive feel, lightweight, and general zippiness. Very much a wolf in sheep's clothing, here's why the Speedgoat 6 remains a cult classic...
The shoe's lightweight yet durable construction includes an updated, breathable mesh upper that enhances ventilation while providing a secure fit. With a wider forefoot and midfoot design over previous iterations, the Speedgoat feels plenty stable over loose terrain and allows for ample toe splay.
The full-length EVA foam midsole, combined with the brand's signature Meta-Rocker technology, offers good impact absorption when it comes to running over more compact ground. This isn't at the expense of propulsion though, the curved form (4mm drop) literally rocks you off your feet, keeping that footfall rolling forward with much less effort than flatter, zero-drop shoes like the Vibram 5-fingers or the Merrell Vapor Glove 6.
Moving down to the outsole, the Speedgoat is equipped with 5mm zonal rubber lugs placement which ensures traction and grip both through lateral and medial planes of movement, which are a dream when tackling awkward ascents and loose terrain.
Through our testing, we found that the Speedgoat 6 excels best over long-distance. It's one of the only shoes we've been impressed with straight out of the box, and that says a lot. There's also a Gore-Tex version available for wet-weather running. Now vegan and made from recycled components, we're happy to see Hoka take steps towards improving sustainability.
Read our Hoka Speedgoat 6 review or find the women's version here
Pros
- Excellent cushioning
- Supportive and stable
- Good traction
- Relatively lightweight
- Rockered outsole
- Available in wider fit
Cons
- Not as breathable as some rivals
- Not geared towards ultra distances
- No Gore-Tex/waterproof version (yet)
RRP: | £139.99 ($155) |
Women’s sizes (UK): | 3½-10½ |
Men’s sizes (UK): | 6½-13½ |
Weight: | 286g / 10.1oz (men’s UK size 9) |
Drop: | 5mm |
Stack height: | Men’s 40mm heel, 35mm toe |
Women’s 38mm heel, 33mm toe | |
Lugs: | 5mm |
Versions: | Regular, wide |
The Merrell Morphlite is a solid option for new trail runners seeking an affordable hybrid shoe that transitions well between road and trail. Over a month of testing on Surrey’s muddy trails and woodland paths, the Morphlite impressed with its excellent grip and breathability, performing well during quick changes in direction and on mixed surfaces.
At just 215g per shoe, the Morphlite feels light and bouncy, but this comes at the cost of comfort. Its firm FloatPro Foam midsole lacks the cushioning needed for longer runs, causing discomfort over sharp terrain or extended distances. The shoe’s flat profile also promotes overpronation, making it less suitable for runners with ankle or tendon vulnerabilities.
The outsole features a mix of 3mm perimeter lugs and 2mm multi-surface lugs, striking a balance between road and trail traction. While not fully waterproof, the double-lined toe box and splashproof upper offer a decent defence against wet conditions.
Sustainability-conscious runners will appreciate the use of recycled materials, including 100% recycled laces and mesh components, though this shoe doesn’t fall under Merrell’s dedicated eco-friendly range.
If you’re starting out on trails or sticking to shorter distances, the Morphlite delivers value and reliable grip at an accessible price point. For those eyeing longer or more technical runs, a more cushioned option might be worth considering.
Read our Merrell Morphlite review or find the men's version here
Pros
- Sole transfers well from road to trail
- Splashproof upper
- Good breathability
- Great grip when changing direction
- Excellent value
Cons
- Flat footed style encourages overpronation
- Padding doesn't stack up well on sharp terrain
RRP: | £89.99 / $110.15 |
Women's sizes (UK) | 4–9 |
Men's sizes (UK) | 7–14 |
Weight (UK size 6.5) | 215g/7.6oz per shoe |
Drop | 6.5mm |
Stack height | 26.5mm – 20.0mm |
Lugs | 3mm (perimeter) 2mm (multi-surface) |
Waterproof version | No |
If you’re looking for a do-it-all hybrid at a wallet-friendly price, the Gel-Venture 10 is hard to beat. At just £70, it’s an absolute bargain, offering a surprisingly smooth ride on the road and enough trail grip to handle dry, hard-packed paths and rocky tracks.
It’s not the lightest or flashiest shoe on test, but it punches well above its weight in comfort, support and versatility.
The AMPLIFOAM midsole, paired with Asics’ signature GEL cushioning in the heel, gives a soft yet stable feel underfoot, particularly suited to heel strikers and runners who underpronate. The 10mm drop, firm foam and structured heel all work together to support higher arches and absorb shock on repetitive road miles.
Up top, the padded mesh upper may look old-school, but it proved breathable in 30°C+ conditions and gave a locked-in fit with zero foot slide or rubbing. There’s no gusseted tongue, but the fit is dialled-in enough to keep dust and debris out.
The 2.5mm arrow lugs on the outsole provide just enough traction for light trail use, though they’re likely to struggle in wet or muddy conditions.
For shorter runs up to 20km, the Gel-Venture 10 is an excellent choice – especially if you’re new to trail or just want something you can wear door-to-trail without blowing the budget. Durability is yet to be proven long-term, but early signs are good.
Read our Asics Gel-Venture 10 review or find the men's version here
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Comfortable and well-fitting
- Performs on both road and light trail
- A stable shoe for neutral to underpronators
Cons
- Grip can be limited
- The 10mm drop won’t suit everyone
RRP: | £70/$79.99 |
Weight: | 274g/9.67oz (women's UK5.5) |
Waterproof version? | Yes |
Stack height: | N/A |
Drop: | 10mm |
Lugs: | 2.5mm |
Women's sizes: | UK 5-10 |
Men's sizes: | UK 6-14 |
New for 2025 in its third generation, the Scott Kinabalu 3 is back again with a “full re-design” and “improved comfort, protection and running efficiency”, according to the Swiss brand. We quickly found this description to be bang on – the Kinabalu 3 feels much more agile and cushioned than its predecessor.
The upper uses a tried and tested design, with soft and lightweight ripstop mesh covering the forefoot and top of the toe, and a sturdier thermoplastic polyerethane reinforcing the heel, toe, and sides. We noticed some decent flex in the polymer, with a fairly standard fit that feels locked in on the top but still accommodates your usual swell and splay.
The big highlight on the Kinabalu 3 is the midsole cushioning and rocker shape, which feels nicely springy and energetic, especially for a trail shoe that looks, at first glance, a bit chunky. The midsole is fairly thick, providing a comfortable and plush feel, and ultimately making us pleasantly surprised by how fast our test runs ended up being.
This is partially thanks to the rocker shape of the midsole which increases efficiency and gets you into a good flow on the trail. We were also quite impressed with the materials underfoot, which are all proprietary. Scott's 'Kinetic Foam' comprises the midsole and was notably light and responsive – Scott claim the material "provides 14% more energy than standard EVA".
Meanwhile, the proprietary outsole leans into this smooth flowing approach with 3.5mm chevron-shaped lugs. It's not a very aggressive pattern or depth, but similar to the North Face Vectiv Pro, it excels when you're wanting to move fast over hard packed paths in the hills or woodlands.
We tested this shoe on a mixture of trails in the Lake District, and while they certainly aren't fell running shoes, the Kinabalu 3 is an excellent pick for mixed terrain, including the odd pavement which, let's face it, we can't all avoid.
Read our Scott Kinabalu 3 review or find the women's version here
Pros
- Excellent midsole
- Good cushioning
- Light
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- Not the most aggressive outsole
RRP: | £144.99 ($150) |
Women's sizes: | 3-8.5 |
Men's sizes: | 6-13 |
Versions: | GTX, non-GTX |
Drop: | 7mm |
Stack height: | 29.5mm heel, 22.5mm forefoot |
Lugs: | 3.5mm |
Weight (men's UK 8): | 327g / 11.5oz per shoe |
The Stinson 7 is, in typical Hoka fashion, the exact opposite of a sleek, minimalist running shoe. It features a thick EVA midsole with a towering 42mm/37mm stack height (40mm/35mm in the women's version).
We wore worried this would affect the stability of shoe, but Hoka have compensated by giving the Stinson 7 an extra wide platform.
Between the width and height of this sole unit, of course the Stinson 7 is outrageously comfortable. We'd even call it pillowy. The midsole features a design touch called Metarocker which aids heel-to-toe transitions, which works nicely with the huge amounts of cushioning to create a seamless flow when you're running.
Of course, this only lasts until things get hairy on the trail. Weighing 365g (men's 10) and sporting that wide outsole makes the Stinson 7 a tad clompy, which is great for long distances, but does come at the cost of agility. We wouldn't pick it for skyrunning.
That said, the Durabrasion rubber outsole performed pretty well across a range of terrains. It features 4mm lugs and wide mud channels which did their job on wetter outings. We've seen this sole before on the Hoka Challenger 7, and we were impressed then as well. Being able to handle damp grass is critical, and we were pleased to find that the Stinson 7 could hold its own all throughout the Yorkshire moors.
It may not be the best for tricky terrain, but if you're hitting more typical UK trails and looking for comfort and stability, then this shoe is the ticket.
Read our Hoka Stinson 7 review review or find the women's version here
Pros
- Sumptuous cushioning
- Stable
- Vegan
- Decent grip
- Versatile
Cons
- Big stack height not for everyone
- Look a bit clumpy
Men's sizes | UK6.5 - 14.5 |
Women's sizes | UK3.5 - 9.5 |
Waterproof version? | No |
Weight (men's 10) | 365g |
Drop | 5mm |
Stack height | 42mm/37mm |
Lugs | 4mm |
Few shoes walk the line between cushioning and structure as confidently as the Asics Trabuco Max 4. It keeps the plush, protective ride that road-to-trail runners love about the Trabuco Max series, while firming things up with a more stabilised platform and slightly lowered stack height.
You don’t get much ground feel, but you do get smooth transitions, strong heel-to-toe flow, and an impressively locked-in fit. we love the upper – the jacquard mesh is much softer and more breathable than the previous version we tried (read our Trabuco Max 3 review).
Although it’s not as tough as ripstop or Matryx alternatives, the structure holds together well thanks to a TPU perimeter overlay and thick ankle padding. The heel and collar feel especially plush, creating a snug, secure fit right out of the box.
Underfoot, the FF Blast+ Eco midsole feels firmer than before, but still protects your feet on sharp or uneven trails. The new M-shaped lugs on the ASICSGRIP outsole add subtle traction improvements and help deliver that smooth, rolling ride on woodland paths and hard-packed ground.
It isn't a bargain, but the Trabuco Max 4's combination of long-distance comfort, consistent performance and subtle eco upgrades (including a bio-based midsole) help justify the price. It definitely deserves top spot for road-to-trail.
Read our Asics Trabuco Max 4 review or find the women's version here
Pros
- Excellent cushioning in midsole
- Versatile lug pattern
- Stiffer midsole is better for different running styles
- Smooth rocker geometry
Cons
- Lacks proprioception
- Upper fabric isn't as durable as other options
RRP: | £160/$160 |
Weight (Men's UK 9): | 315g/11.25oz |
Stack height: | 41mm heel; 36mm forefoot |
Drop: | 5mm |
Lugs: | 4mm |
Upper: | Jacquard-woven mesh with TPU perimeter overlays |
Midsole: | FF Blast+ Eco (includes bio-based content ~24%) |
Outsole: | ASICSGRIP rubber |
The Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed trail running shoes stand out for their exceptional breathability, lightness, and responsiveness. Designed for fast-paced trail races, they feature a synthetic upper with seamless overlays that provide comfort and agility. However, their breathability comes at the cost of water resistance, making them less ideal for wet conditions. They dry quickly, but frequent wet runs may call for a more waterproof option.
The midsole combines Lightstrike and Lightstrike Pro foams, delivering a cushioned yet responsive feel that absorbs impact and boosts energy efficiency. The shoe's rocker-like structure promotes forward momentum, making it excellent for straight-line running on relatively even trails. However, the lack of lateral support can be a drawback on uneven terrain or during directional changes.
The Terrex Agravic Speed's Continental rubber soles with 3mm lugs offer good traction on most surfaces, though they perform best in dry or mildly wet conditions. The lugs' design favors linear movement, aligning with the shoe's overall purpose. Despite their strengths, the shoes can be uncomfortable on slopes due to minimal padding around the ankles.
Other notable features include textured laces that stay tied and a lightweight asymmetric tongue that enhances comfort. The shoes are incredibly light and responsive, making them ideal for runners seeking a swift, energetic experience. Overall, the Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed excels in providing a fast, enjoyable run on suitable trails, though it may not be the best choice for very uneven or consistently wet terrain.
**Read our Terrex Agravic Speed review or find the women's version here
**
We've also just reviewed the GTX Version!
Pros
- Lightweight
- Great breathability
- Excellent responsiveness and propulsion
- Inexplicably cool looking laces
Cons
- Not much lateral support
Men's sizes (UK) | 5.5-14.5 |
Women's sizes (UK) | 5.5-14.5 |
Waterproof version? | N/A |
Weight | 240g (UK 8.5) |
The first thing that hit us when we opened the box of the Altra Outroad 2 was the same thing that hits us with all Altra shoes. The shape.
Thanks to the brand’s signature Foot Shape toe box, which allows your toes to splay out naturally rather than cramp up inside, the front of the shoe seems wider than most running shoes. We’ll be honest, you’ll probably either love that enlarged toe box design or hate it. And we’re still a bit undecided on where we sit.
So what’s good about the Outroad 2? For a start it’s a big win for runners who prefer zero drop – a completely flat sole, with heel and forefoot on the same level. Our tester has also recently been running in the Scarpa Golden Gate ATR, which has a relatively low 4mm drop, but the difference here felt immediate.
If you’re a heal striker, these shoes aren’t for you. But if you tend to plant your forefoot or midfoot first, the Altra Outroad will probably be right up your street.
The Outroad seems to easily mix between road and trail. We measured the multidrectional lugs at around 2.5mm in length, and in our experience the MaxTrac rubber outsole is capable of holding its own on everything from mud and rock to sand and grass.
We’ve worn them on plenty of mid-length runs, as well as to the office and around town, and the comfort levels never seem to drop. This is a multi-functional shoe you’d be happy to wear for plenty of different activities.
The breathability feels good but protection is fairly minimal, with no rock plate beneath the Altra EGO midsole, so keep them away from the mountains. However, in terms of durability we’ve had no issues so far. In fact, they still look as good as new after a few months and well over 100 miles of use.
So overall, we’re impressed. If zero drop is what you’re looking for in a road to trail shoe, and you don’t get offended by the slightly bulbous front end of the Outroad, this could be the one. One thing to note though – this is a slim fit shoe, so worth trying before you buy to make sure you get the right size.
Find the men's version here
Pros
- Wide toe box lets your toes spread
- Great for fans of zero drop shoes
- Move between road and trail seamlessly
- Comfort and breathability are good
Cons
- You may hate that wide toe box!
- Slim fitting, so you may want to up a size
RRP: | £125/$140 |
Weight (UK 9): | 303g/10.69oz |
Men's sizes: | 6-14 |
Women's sizes: | 3.5-10 |
Drop: | 0mm |
Stack height: | 27mm |
Lugs: | 2.5mm |
The Nike Zegama 2 stands out for its impressive cushioning, featuring a squishy ZoomX midsole that offers a comfortable and springy feel. As well as comfort, the shoe's high stack provides excellent energy return, and we enjoyed taking it for bouncy and fast test runs.
At first, seeing such a high stack, we did worry about the Zegama 2's stability. However, the midsole's slightly curved edges add a lot of security and and provides a wide landing platform, so the shoe doesn't feel like an ankle breaker at all.
The Vibram Megagrip outsole is a significant upgrade from the original Zegama, providing reliable traction with 4mm lugs arranged for optimal grip. It performs well on both wet and dry surfaces, sticking firmly to wet rocks and shedding mud efficiently. We also found that the outsole's flexibility helped with getting some good ground feel.
The upper is made of a thin, ventilated mesh that ensures excellent breathability. Key features include an internal heel counter for stability, a thin overlay at the toe for protection, a small ankle gaiter to keep out debris, and a padded U-shaped section that cradles the rear foot.
The Zegama has all the bells and whistles, but it manages to do so without being overly flashy or having an obnoxiously high stack.
In all, the Zegama 2 is supremely comfortable and it's relatively short lugs provided much more traction than we were expecting. It performs excellently on road and trail, so we say grab it if you want a good all-rounder for summer.
Read our Nike Zegama 2 review or find the women's version here
Pros
- Excellent cushioning
- Great grip on slick surfaces
- Durable reinforcement around pressure points
- Good flex in the midsole
Cons
- Extended heel won't be to everyone's taste
RRP: | £164.99/$180<br><a href="https://www.nike.com/gb/t/zegama-2-trail-running-shoes-lBqg4F/FD5190-402"></a> |
Weight: | 320g/11.29oz (men's UK 9) |
Waterproof version? | N/A |
Stack height: | 33mm/29mm |
Drop: | 4mm |
Lugs: | 3mm |
Women's sizes | UK 5-8 |
Men's sizes | UK 7-12 |
The Salomon Sense Ride 5 is designed to be a lightweight, versatile trail running shoe for mixed trails. Salomon claims the Sense 5 is equally competent over short and ultra distances.
With a lug pattern clearly angled towards hard-packed trails and at 3.5mm, these shoes really maximise grip over firmer ground thanks to the Contragrip sole. This makes them ideal for occasional stints on the road. They're also agile, managing to remain surprisingly lightweight despite the comfort provided.
For those with slightly narrower than average feet, the Sense 5 feels blissfully comfortable in use. The generous heel arch hugs and supports the foot, while the padded heel nicely locks you in place to avoid slippage during descents. Despite this, there's clearly a balance being struck here between padding and agility, with the forefoot feeling firm and responsive.
Overall, the Sense 5 is a great choice for those door to hilltop runs where you need a good all-rounder trail shoe to get the job done. Sounds good to you?
Read our Salomon Sense Ride 5 review or find the women's version here
Pros
- Good value
- Great for a wide range of terrain
- Balance of cushioning and responsiveness
- Quicklace system
Cons
- Mid to narrower fit won't suit all
- Brand sustainability could be better
RRP: | £135 |
Weight (UK8.5): | 286g/10.09oz |
Women's sizes: | UK3.5 - 9.5 |
Men's sizes: | UK6.5 - 13.5 |
Drop: | 8mm |
Stack height: | 29.6mm/21.3mm |
Lugs: | 3.5mm |
Waterproof version? | Yes |
The Hoka Challenger 7 is a boldly designed, plush road to trail running shoe with the typical Hoka flare. The Challenger 7 is ideal for runners who are after a shoe that'll provide both comfort over hard surfaces and traction over non-technical off-road terrain.
Compared to its predecessor, the Challenger 7 features a redesigned midsole with increased cushioning, yet at a lower weight. Plus, there's a Gore-Tex version for winter running.
The shoe's midsole is made of soft compression-molded EVA foam with an increased stack height, providing ample impact absorption. The Durabrasion rubber outsole has 4mm lugs which fare well over grass, shallow mud and gravel trails.
The Challenger 7's engineered mesh upper has been redesigned to be more breathable than the 6, with ventilation points at the centre of the foot which help to avoid getting overly sweaty while running. It's easy to slide the shoes on via the exaggerated heel tab, with the padded heel collar helping to lock in the foot when running.
While not the most agile option, the Challenger 7 are best suited to training runs when you want to be comfortable and supported. They're best suited to medium-distance runs, offering a good balance between road and trail performance.
Read our Hoka Challenger 7 review or find the men's version here
Pros
- Cushioned and comfy
- Thick midsole for impact absorption
- Tack both road and non-technical trail
Cons
- Not grippy in thick mud
- Heavier than some
RRP: | £130/$150 |
Weight (UK5): | 218g/7.69oz |
Waterproof version? | Yes |
Men's sizes: | UK7-UK13.5 |
Drop: | 5mm |
Stack height: | 31mm/26mm |
Lugs: | 4mm |
Women's sizes: | UK3.5-UK10.5 |
The Blissfeel Trail is lululemon’s first-ever pair of trail running shoes, the brand having previously stuck to sleek sportswear, plus a few gym and road trainers.
While this shoe shares a midsole with original Blissfeel shoe, the Blissfeel Trail’s upper is made to be more durable than its road counterpart, with an extra protective layer to improve longevity. You'll also find a rubber toe bumper for further protection, though it is fairly slim.
We're pleased to see a grippy TPU rubber outsole, which sports unique-looking circular lugs of 4mm. These aim to help provide traction and stability over uneven terrain, but they're not as aggressive as most other hardcore trail shoes.
In our testing, we found that the moulded heel succeeds in its design intention, huging and securing the foot to avoid any slippage. Meanwhile, the outsole rubber climbs up the heel to produce a slightly extended heel counter for extra stability as you run.
And, of course, we might as well mention the aesthetics. You do find that classic Lululemon look, with some multi-tonal colourways that made us bite our nails when hitting the mucky trails. The subtle off-white colouring didn't last too long, but maybe you'll get more out of them as a primarily road-running shoe.
Read our lululemon Blissfeel Trail review
Pros
- Road to trail entry shoe
- Versatile
- Good visibility
- Mid price-point
Cons
- Not super run-ergonomic
- Lack propulsion
- Could do with more cushioning
RRP: | £148/$158 |
Weight (per UK6.5 shoe) | 280g/9.8oz |
Women's sizes | UK3.5 - 10.5 |
Drop | 9.5mm |
Stack | Unknown |
Lugs | 4mm |
Waterproof version? | No |
Get discounts from Run 1000 Miles!
A lot of the shoes we recommend above are available, usually at a great price, on Sportsshoes. So remember, if anything catches your eye, you can save 15% on trail running gear by signing up to our Run 1000 Miles Challenge. Get your bespoke discount code here and enjoy the savings at Sportsshoes.com!
What to look for in a road to trail shoe

Carbon
On the road, carbon plates can offer a serious performance edge – delivering added propulsion, smoother transitions and a touch of impact protection on hard, flat surfaces. For road-to-trail runners, the benefits of carbon are still present, but their effectiveness can drop off when the terrain gets loose or uneven.
If you’re mostly running pavement with occasional detours onto gravel or dry trails, a plated shoe can feel fast and efficient. Just bear in mind that most carbon shoes are stiffer and pricier, and not all are built with trail durability in mind.
Breathability
A good road-to-trail shoe should handle heat as well as dust, grit and the odd puddle. Look for breathable mesh uppers that allow airflow during long summer runs, but are still rugged enough to cope with off-road abrasion.
You’ll want something that balances ventilation with durability – too much structure can overheat your feet on tarmac, but too little and you'll shred the uppers on rougher trails.
Weight
Lightweight shoes tend to favour road speed, but too little structure can feel unstable when you leave the tarmac.
For mixed terrain, aim for a shoe under 300g if you want to feel quick and nimble, or closer to 320–350g if you value extra cushioning and support on uneven ground. As always, the right weight depends on your distance, running style and preferred feel underfoot.
Drop
Most road-to-trail shoes sit in the middle ground when it comes to drop – typically between 6mm and 10mm. A lower drop (4–6mm) can offer a more natural, ground-connected feel and encourage midfoot striking, while a higher drop (8–10mm) often feels more forgiving on long descents or hard pavement.
If you’re used to road shoes, stick with what’s comfortable. Switching to a lower drop should be a gradual process, or you risk tight calves and grumpy Achilles tendons.
Fit
Foot shape and personal preference still reign supreme, but a few fit features are especially important for road-to-trail use. A secure midfoot and locked-in heel help on twisty paths and rocky patches, while a slightly roomier toe box offers comfort during longer road miles.
Classic lacing systems offer good adjustability, but if you’re hitting steeper trails, consider dial systems like BOA or Salomon’s Quicklace for extra stability.
Lug length
This is where the hybrid nature of road-to-trail shoes really shows. Most models opt for shallower 2–4mm lugs to strike a balance between grip and road comfort. That’s enough traction for dry trails, gravel tracks and light woodland – but not so aggressive that you feel lumpy or unstable on tarmac.
If your runs include wet mud or steep slopes, look for shoes with slightly deeper lugs or more widely spaced tread patterns for extra bite. Otherwise, a mid-length lug is ideal for varied conditions.
Do I need road to trail running shoes?
If you're thinking of exploring beyond pavements and paths, then learning all about trail running shoes is an important step, for your own safety as much as comfort.
A sleek pair of road running shoes is are a couple of knee-scrap time bombs if you start to take them into wet and wild woodlands or uneven rocky terrain.
You need running shoes with extra protection to ward off errant rocks and roots, and lugs along the outsole (grippy spikes on the bottom) to latch onto the ground and help propel you forwards as you enjoy the trail.
But, of course, mostly everyone will need to contend with both road and trail on their everyday run routes, so investing in a road to trail shoe can make your runs much more enjoyable and smooth.
They strike the perfect balance between cushioning, midsole impact absorption, and grip, to deliver a shoe that can cope with extended sections of road running as well as some mildly muddy and gentle trails.
How road to trail running shoes should fit
The size you choose for your next pair of road to trail running shoes really depends on what distance you're planning to run.
We’re not suggesting you go crazy and order several sizes up from your usual digits, but it’s worth bearing in mind that as you run, four-times your bodyweight goes through your feet upon impact with the ground. That’s basically like repeatedly hitting the soles of your feet with a frying pan for the duration of your run.
Obviously, this is going to have an impact on your feet - they will swell. So to ensure you remain comfortable and rub-free, it’s worth sizing up 0.5-1 sizes on what you’re normally used to wearing, especially if you’re planning on running long distances.
Other than that, make sure if your feet are particularly wide you get a wide-fit shoe or look at brands like Altra whose shoes are designed with extra room in the toe-box. Equally, if your feet are extra narrow, you’ll need slimmer shoes like some Salomon ones, in order to still be able to achieve that locked-in, blister-free fit.
Caring for your road to trail running shoes

A bit of footwear care can seriously extend the lifespan of your outdoor gear. Keep fabrics clean to maintain breathability, and waterproof fabrics need reproofing every so often to maintain water repellency. Here are the main staples of our kit care collections...
Best dryer bags

www.sidas.com
Especially as the weather is getting worse, we can't recommend these dryer bags enough. While the other products in this list will keep your shoes squeaky clean on the outside, these will help soak up the moisture from your running shoes on the inside. This is crucial for mitigating that lethal post-run 'pong'.
The way they work is pretty neat – the sacks are stuffed with 100% cedar wood, which absorbs moisture out of the inside of a shoe four times quicker than air drying. They're also re-useable – simply hang them up to dry after use for six hours in between runs, then they're ready to go again!
Pros
- Good for multiple uses
- Greatly reduces chances of mould
- Refreshes your shoes in 4 hours
Cons
- Takes up to 6 hours between uses
Best cleaner spray
This spray is a PFC-free, environmentally conscious spot cleaner (275ml), designed for footwear and outdoors gear. It's also Gore-Tex friendly, so won't denigrate the longevity of your waterproofing.
Pros
- Sustainable ingredients
- Cleans without reducing protection
- Good value for long term use
Cons
- Best used with a good amount of water
Best care kit

This Nikwax bundle is a footwear care kit for leather and fabric materials, complete with a brush and a dry bag. This kit earns high marks for its sustainability credentials, and the included dry bag proves invaluable during extended running trips and adventures.
Pros
- Versatile
- Dry bag is effective
- Can be used on multi-fabric items
Cons
- Brush can be quite coarse
About the authors

Our test team brings a wide range of running styles and preferences to the table. LFTO’s trail running guru Milo Wilson prefers slower paces and longer miles – ideal for putting all-day cushioning to the test. Marooned in Surrey, he can’t reach a soft trail without first navigating a Waitrose car park, which makes him the perfect candidate for hybrid shoes like his long-time favourite, the Saucony Xodus Ultra.
Kate Milsom, former LFTO trail editor and still one of our go-to testers, has raced competitive marathons and ultras. Her penchant for races across all surfaces has turned Kate into an unmatched expert in what makes a good road to trail model.
And finally, Nick Hallissey, deputy editor of Country Walking, became a running convert after we made him try the illustrious Hoka Speedgoat 6. He now joins us in testing lightweight trainers, occasionally smashing a parkrun in the name of science.