Before we talk about the best men's running shorts, let's address a topic that may be on your mind: Running does not require specialist equipment. That's one of the best things about it. However, we do find that as we improve our performance, we want to improve the quality of our gear too.
There are some excellent men's running shorts out there, and we’ve done enough side-by-side comparison tests to decide that they are, indeed, worth the investment. Once you've got yourself some decent trail running shoes first, obviously.
Airy, lightweight shorts are an absolute blessing in the warmer months. And it takes some fairly high-quality materials and construction to get a pair that's light and durable enough to handle plenty of use.
Of course, in winter you could invest in some running leggings, but generally, you can't beat a good pair of shorts.
We know everyone has their own preference when it comes to shorts, particularly regarding length and the great pocket debate. That’s why in this guide, we’ve tested and recommended a wide range of different options so there’s something for everyone.
The best running shorts for men at a glance
Best in test: Salomon Sense Aero
Best value: Alpkit Vayper
Best twin-skin shorts: Inov8 TrailFly Ultra 7" 2in1 Shorts
Best ultralight shorts: Montane Men's Slipstream
How we tested these running shorts
Any pair of running shorts will get you from A to B, but the best ones need to go further – staying comfortable, practical, and in good shape after months of use.
To make sure the models in this list were up to standard, we ran in them over a variety of distances and terrains, from short lunchtime blasts to long, hilly trail runs. We paid close attention to fit, fabric feel, breathability, and how well they prevented chafing on hot days.
Durability was a big focus. We made sure each pair could handle keys or a phone bouncing in the pocket without wearing thin, and survive repeated spins through the washing machine without seams unravelling or fabrics losing shape.
Storage was also key: we looked for pocket layouts that kept essentials secure without bounce or bulk. Testing was led by Milo Wilson, LFTO’s trail running guru, who took shorts across bridleways, forest tracks, and road sections to see how they performed in mixed conditions.
He was joined by Nick Hallissey, deputy editor of Country Walking and keen runner, who knows how to spot the difference between shorts that are merely fine and those you’ll still be reaching for after dozens of runs. The result is a list of shorts you can trust to last longer than a couple of 10k trail races.
The best men's running shorts in detail:
Minimalist. Truth is, we could start and end this review with that word and it would be entirely true to the product. Essentially what you have here is a pair of soft, breathable boxer shorts with a light fabric outer shell (Salomon call it Aerotech) stitched on top. And that’s it. This design means there’s almost no adjustability (ie, no lacing or drawcord) so you need to be sure they’re going to fit before you buy. But once you know they do fit, they’re excellent.
They are exceptionally light and airy, with outstanding freedom of movement, which makes them perfect for summer trails. Ventilation is great, but even when you’re high up and the temperature drops, that boxer-short snugness stops things getting too chilly.
The pockets take a little getting used to, though. There are four of them, housed around the front and sides of the waistband, with tiny pull-tabs to help you open them out. Each one can take a key or a gel or a timing chip, but you won’t want to bulk them up too much when they sit so uncomfortably around the abdomen.
The only other caveat we’ve found so far is that a couple of the seams have started to look a little tatty and frayed after just a few weeks’ use. It doesn’t feel in any way terminal, but we’d hope that such a premium offering would hold it together a little longer.
But aside from that, and if you’re not bothered about carrying a lot of stuff in that strange waistband gallery, the Aeros look to be a very sound investment for summer trail running.
Pros
- Fantastically lightweight
- Good number of pockets
- Great fit (once you've got it right)
Cons
- Filling pockets can make the shorts tight around the waist
| RRP: | £65 |
| Weight: | 104g |
| Fabric: | 73% Polyamide, 27% Elastane |
| Sizes: | XS–XL |
A pair of top-notch running shorts is all very well, but sometimes the price is simply too high. Alpkit offers a great solution with the affordable Vyaper shorts.
They’re a pair of very lightweight and minimalist running shorts, featuring a simple brief lining, rear stash pocket, and that’s about it. All the better for it, we reckon. Consequently, it’s a great option for warmer weather, but not so much in cold conditions.
Personally, I prefer longer running shorts so the Vayper 6 suits me best, but there is a Vayper 4 as well, for those who prefer shorter. Either way, they’re also good for summer hikes too and can even double as swimwear.
Not only are the Vayper shorts great value, Alpkit is also B Corp-certified, a 1% For The Planet member, and a Living Wage Foundation employer.
Pros
- Great value
- Lightweight
- Breathable
- Two lengths available
Cons
- Doesn't use recycled material
| Weight | 80g |
| Inseam length | 6 or 4 inches |
| Liner | Yes |
| Pockets | Rear stash |
This was our pick for 'Best in Test' last year, and we're keeping it on the 2025 list because they're still excellent shorts - and are now more affordable than ever! No matter what kind of run you're going on, the Rab Talus Active Shorts are always fantastic.
In colder or wet weather? Sure – the outer is made from Rab’s Matrix fabric, which protects against the wind and has a PFC-free DWR to keep water at bay. Yet, it’s also fast drying. The 7-inch length and lining provide good coverage and that bit of extra warmth.
For long runs? Absolutely – the Talus Active Shorts are super breathable and comfy. Our testers experienced no discomfort or rubbing spots. The inner is made from Rab’s Flexile material, which is stretchy but supportive. There are also plenty of clever pockets.
For challenging and technical routes? You bet – they're a slim fit but have stretch to offer plenty freedom of movement. They also offer UPF protection, which is great for routes on summer days when shade is scarce.
The upfront cost is a bit, but the returns are so good it’s a very fruitful investment. Plus, we're seeing it discounted up to 50% these days.
Pros
- Very breathable
- Great for year-round use
- Suitable for all types of runs
- PFC-free DWR
Cons
- Slim fit may not suit everyone
- No recycled material used
| Weight | 125g |
| Inseam length | 7 inches |
| Liner | Yes, tight |
| Pockets | 2 x thigh mesh; zipped rear; front stash |
When I first pulled on the Inov8 TrailFly Ultra 7" 2in1 Shorts, I was a bit sceptical about the tight inner layer—it felt almost too snug. But once I hit the trails, they really came into their own. The inner layer settled into a second-skin fit, offering brilliant support without feeling restrictive. I was particularly impressed by the silicone grip at the hem, which kept everything firmly in place, even during long, wet, and windy runs. No ride-up, no adjustments needed—just total focus on the trail.
The pockets were a highlight for me, too. They’re small, but they’re secure. I stashed a couple of gels in the waistband and never once worried about them bouncing out. Even the zipped pocket for my phone felt sleek and unobtrusive.
The outer layer is lightweight and breathable, with a decent water-repellent finish that handled muddy spray and light rain. Plus, the side splits and stretchy material gave me full freedom of movement. Whether I was powering uphill or flying down technical descents, these shorts kept up without fuss.
If you’re after supportive, no-nonsense shorts for long trail runs, these deliver. The snug fit might take some getting used to, but it’s worth it for the comfort and performance they offer.
Pros
- Soft and breathable liner
- Recycled polyester outer
- Good coverage and support
Cons
- Currently very limited stock
| Weight | 190g |
| Inseam length | 6 inches (outer) |
| Liner | Yes, tight |
| Pockets | Thigh stash; rear zipped |
With a mission statement that blends psychology, Zen philosophy and masochism (‘through suffering the runner finally silences the ego’), Acid Running seem to be targeting a weirdly cerebral corner of the running market. That said, there’s nothing especially off-the-wall or unusual about these 2-in-1 shorts, which consist of an integrated compression lining with a loose and gossamer-thin outer shell. They are ridiculously comfortable over short and long distances, with no hint of chafing after several long runs. The inner lining offers plenty of stretch and decent compression, as well as warmth when the wind is up.
Storage is pretty good, too. You get a decent-size stretch pocket on the thigh of the inner lining; it’s ideal for a few energy gels and it will swallow a smartphone – although it’s pretty uncomfortable stashing a phone there, especially if it’s bulked up by a weatherproof case. There’s also a tiny zipped security pocket round the back; useful for a single car key but not much more – we couldn’t even squeeze in a tray of paracetamol.
Overall it’s a great package in itself, but with two drawbacks. The first, and this seems to be common to the Acid Running range as a whole, is that there’s no specific offering for women. The other is value for money. Under Armour have similar shorts ranging from £45 to £65 with equal or better storage, and we have a pair of online cheapies from Amazon (the comically named ‘brand’ Arsuxeo) which do more or less the same job, with full-size and secure zip pockets, for just £20.
But if you’re looking for prestige, build quality and shorts that are likely to last a little while longer (and if you want to silence your ego through suffering, of course), then these might be what you’re looking for.
Pros
- Great stretch pockets
- Compression lining is super comfortable
- Very stylish
Cons
- The price point is hard to swallow
These 7- or 5-inch shorts weigh just 80g and provide the ideal mix of coverage, breathability, and comfort. As a result, they’re ideal for almost any type of run. We tested the 7-inch version.
There’s no liner, so you can easily pair them with leggings if you wish, but then they’re also ideal for long summer runs too. There’s plenty of stretch and the Slipstream 7 has the best waistband of all the shorts here. It’s broader than most and fits really snug – easily adjusted by the drawcord too. Even with a phone in the rear zipped pocket, these shorts stay firmly in place.
While performance and comfort are hard to fault, it’d be nice to see more recycled fabric used here. The nylon used in the waistband is recycled, but the polyester in the main fabric isn’t.
Pros
- Lightweight
- Highly breathable
- 7 and 5-inch lengths available
- Great for summer and races
Cons
- Main material not recycled
| Weight | 80g |
| Inseam length | 5 or 7 inches |
| Liner | No |
| Pockets | Rear zipped |
Another excellent design, the Summit Pacesetter running shorts tick most boxes. The North Face’s Summit Series Trail Run range is its top tier running gear.
The Summit Pacesetter shorts certainly feel part of that crowd. They’re incredibly comfortable and breathable, being made from a stretchy nylon (main and waistband) and polyester (liner). The polyester and nylon are recycled, too.
In addition, the fabrics are quick-drying and the nylon has a PFC-free DWR. There are 5- and 7-inch versions, which should keep most people happy, and a generous rear zipped pocket flanked by mesh stash pockets. There is also another small stash pocket in the liner.
It’s a great design, but not a cheap one, so is best suited for more serious runners.
Pros
- Very comfortable and breathable
- Durable
- Recycled fabric
- PFC-free DWR
Cons
- Overkill for casual runners
| Weight | Not stated |
| Inseam length | 5 or 7 inches |
| Liner | Yes |
| Pockets | 2 x rear stash; rear zipped; internal waist drop-in pocket |
You might be a runner who’s a fan of natural materials. The good news is that Icebreaker makes these wicked running shorts made entirely from merino wool and wood based Tencel fibre.
They’re reasonably lightweight, using a jersey-style fabric for most of the construction and a mesh at the bottom. This means they’re soft to touch, super breathable, and naturally odour resistant.
There’s a mesh lining for some extra support, and a couple of pockets – a rear zipped one and little stash pocket on the right leg. Unfortunately, neither are big enough for a phone. Overall, they’re excellent running shorts, but as ever with Icebreaker gear, it’s expensive*.
*On that note, we also tested the Active Sweat shorts from BAM. They’re not quite as good but are super comfy and less than half the price.
Pros
- Made entirely from naturally derived material
- Soft and breathable
Cons
- Pockets aren’t big enough for a phone
| RRP: | £100 / $120 |
| Weight | 171g |
| Liner | Yes |
| Pockets | Drop-in pocket; rear zipped |
| Inseam length | 5 |
What to look for in men’s running shorts
Length
Length is largely a matter of personal preference. Longer shorts provide more coverage and can offer extra protection from the sun or abrasive vegetation on trail runs. Shorter shorts, on the other hand, are typically lighter, more breathable, and allow for greater freedom of movement – making them a popular choice for speed sessions and races.
Pockets
If you prefer not to run with a belt or vest, pockets become essential. Look for secure, bounce-free pockets that can comfortably hold a phone without flapping around. For long-distance training or races, extra pockets for gels, keys, and other essentials can make a big difference.
Lining
Most running shorts include a built-in liner, either in the form of a breathable mesh brief or a fitted inner short. Mesh liners offer lightweight support and excellent ventilation, while tight-fitting liners can add stability, reduce chafing, and provide additional storage. Going liner-free maximises airflow but may require separate running underwear.
Materials
Synthetic fabrics dominate the running shorts market for good reason – they’re lightweight, quick-drying, and affordable. High-performance brands may blend in merino wool for odour control and comfort. Wherever possible, choose shorts made from recycled or bluesign-approved fabrics, and if a water-repellent coating is used, look for a PFC-free DWR finish.
Running shorts FAQs
Is there a difference between men’s and women’s running shorts?
Yes, but the differences are mostly in fit and cut. Men’s shorts often have a straighter leg and slightly longer inseam, while women’s shorts are generally tailored with a narrower waist and wider hip area for comfort.
Both can feature similar performance fabrics, linings, and storage options, so it’s possible to wear whichever fits you best.
Should I choose lined or unlined running shorts?
It depends on your priorities. Lined shorts save you from wearing separate underwear, reduce the risk of chafing, and can add pockets for storage. Unlined shorts give you the flexibility to pair them with your preferred running underwear or compression shorts, which can be more breathable in hot weather.
How many pockets do I need in running shorts?
For short runs, one secure pocket for a key or card may be enough. For long runs, races, or training without a belt, multiple pockets can be invaluable – allowing you to carry your phone, nutrition, and other small essentials without discomfort.
What’s the best fabric for running shorts?
Most runners opt for lightweight, synthetic fabrics like polyester or nylon, often blended with elastane for stretch. These dry quickly, wick moisture, and resist snagging on the trail. Natural fabrics like merino wool can be excellent for comfort and odour control but tend to be heavier and more expensive.
Do I need special shorts for trail running?
Not necessarily, but trail-specific shorts often include more storage, durable fabrics, and longer cuts for extra coverage. They may also feature water-resistant panels and reinforced stitching for better performance in rugged conditions.
About the authors
Milo Wilson is the main writer and gear tester for Live For The Outdoors' running section, with a particular passion for trail running and all the kit that goes with it. From ultralight race vests to winter-ready trail shoes, Milo has spent years putting gear through its paces in the British countryside.
He favours slower, longer distances where comfort and reliability are key, but he's also been known to chase the odd PB when a bear appears.
Nick Hallissey is the deputy editor of Country Walking magazine, but in recent years has become a die-hard running convert – straying further from his hiking roots with every passing week.
Since discovering the joy of running (and the kit that makes it better), he’s tested everything from lightweight summer shorts to hardcore waterproof trail running shoes, with a growing appetite for faster, longer runs that rival his best days on the trail.