Re: Does the Peak District get a poor showing in Trail
It just needs a little tweaking. There could be more coverage of other area's outside the Lakes and Scotland without damaging the flow of the magazine.
GT mentioned that when the magazine expanded, the readership went up.. Maybe adding another 10-ish pages per issue to cover the extra is possible (an article or two, a couple of routes, a couple of adverts to pay for it)?
GT: Of course you think the balance is right... If you didn't, you'd have already have suggested changes to trail.
(that and the fact if there were more features outside the lakes, you'd have to travel more / or more articles would be written by others).
Isn't a bit of an overlap between Trail and CW a good thing? If there isn't , then you'll get area's that don't get coverage because the don't fit the remit of either mag - even if they deserve it.
How many posting before this post have guffawed at the thought of the PDNP having 'real' mountains, but then baulked at the thought of the bogs? Too difficult for you? Or just scared of getting dirty?